I have a Rolex and I have a Tudor. Two watches from the same company, yet my impression of each is quite different.

To some, there is a stigma associated with Tudor that it's a second rate watch that wants to be like its big brother Rolex but falls short. In other words, the only reason to bought a Tudor was because you couldn't afford the Rolex.

Others look at Tudor as being able to get the Rolex quality for a fraction of the price.

How do you perceive Tudor and Rolex?

Given the choice, what would you rather have, a Sub or a Pelagos/Black Bay? An Explorer or a Ranger? Daytona or Heritage Chronograph?

If you were choosing based on looks alone, would that change your decision?

If the Pelagos was sold by Rolex and Tudor sold the Sub, would you want the Rolex or the Tudor?