-
Member
-
Post Thanks / Like - 6 Likes
-
Nice post and comparison between the vintage and modern, I may try one of these again someday especially if they made a thinner "vintage" style.
-
The Dude Abides
Good comparison. The newer buckle is light years ahead of the vintage one, but no matter the age, they make very nice dive straps.
"Either He's Dead, Or My Watch Has Stopped....."
Groucho Marx
-
Feb 10, 2015, 11:16 AM
#4
-
Feb 11, 2015, 07:13 AM
#5
Member
I've tried one of the modern ones, never again, they are far too thick. Vintage seems the way to go
-
Feb 11, 2015, 07:00 PM
#6
Watch Geek
Thanks for this, the first write up I've seen of the vintage. While I have one of the modern ones and quite like it, the vintage would be a kick to get some exposure to. Only seen a few pics of the originals, this comparison is very helpful (tried to add to your reputation for the informative value of the post, but apparently you were the last one I dished rep too, so I get the message I need to spread more around before I can add to yours again ).
Certainly looks like they've done a good job capturing the look on the modern ones, while perhaps enhancing the overall robustness which should ostensibly translate to more longevity for the strap's life time.
Regards, T Bone
Even a broken watch shows correct time once or twice a day. I ought to know, I have a few!
-
Feb 17, 2015, 01:47 PM
#7
Member
Thanks for the comparison! I have a few modern ones, and I like them a lot, but I would love to find a vintage one. I like thick straps, but thin straps are sometimes more adequate.
-
Feb 17, 2015, 10:01 PM
#8
Thanks for posting! The modern ones have always struck me as too thick, so I have never shelled out the C-note to buy one. Looks like I was justified.
I don't get the obsession with thick and wide straps these days. I never found them comfortable.
-
Feb 21, 2015, 08:45 PM
#9
Member
I agree the thicker new gen ones make sense for today's bigger watch I have the new once since Xmas been happy with it.