-
Oct 14, 2015, 04:39 PM
#1
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Oct 14, 2015, 04:40 PM
#2
Oh that might be the 1 that hits the buy now button for moi
Sent from Galaxy S6 Edge using Tapatalk
People sleep peaceably in their beds @ night ONLY because rough men stand ready to do VIOLENCE
on their behalf.....
William
Member#842
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Oct 14, 2015, 06:00 PM
#3
Originally Posted by
watchdaddy1
Oh that might be the 1 that hits the buy now button for moi
Sent from Galaxy S6 Edge using Tapatalk
Moi aussi. So much for my horological austerity program.
Eterna | Tudor | Seiko | Casio | G-Shock | Orient | Swatch | Mondaine | Zodiac (pre-Fossil) | Rolex | Wenger | Pulsar Time Computer | Omega | Timex | Bucherer | Citizen | Bulova | Glycine
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Oct 14, 2015, 04:40 PM
#4
Hope they're making enough of them....
-
Oct 14, 2015, 04:42 PM
#5
Member
Originally Posted by
Der Amf
Hope they're making enough of them....
That would be my thought too ....
-
Oct 14, 2015, 04:45 PM
#6
@ 2900 €? Now, that can be dangerously attractive...
-
Oct 14, 2015, 05:02 PM
#7
So as Tudor goes "in house" with COSC movements in Rolx quality cases, what's the difference going to be to justify the substantial price difference? A good couple of grand between these and a Sub (albeit a Sub on a bracelet). In reality, very similar watches...
G-Shock: GW3000B-1A
Rolex: Submariner 14060M
Accurist: 1961 Shockmaster (Gold) & 1965 Shockmaster (Steel)
Omega: Speedmaster Professional 3570.50.00
Meistersinger: Perigraph AM1002
Ben Sherman: S489.OOBS
Rotary: 1990 Quartz (Gold)
Steinhart: Ocean GMT 39mm
Certina: DS Super PH500M & DS PH200M
Timex: MKI Mechanical
-
Oct 14, 2015, 05:19 PM
#8
Originally Posted by
OrangeSport
So as Tudor goes "in house" with COSC movements in Rolx quality cases, what's the difference going to be to justify the substantial price difference? A good couple of grand between these and a Sub (albeit a Sub on a bracelet). In reality, very similar watches...
Aren't Rolex going Better Than COSC (soon)?
-
Oct 14, 2015, 05:31 PM
#9
Originally Posted by
Der Amf
Aren't Rolex going Better Than COSC (soon)?
Yeah, but....
To be honest that's just bo77ox.. Every COSC watch can be better than COSC. Every Rolex we've owned has needed regulation to meet COSC and now comfortably betters it. So, I don't see that they're doing anything. Just regulating a little tighter (and re-regulating if required). Pretty sure they're all done uncased, hence the need to re-regulate sometimes...
G-Shock: GW3000B-1A
Rolex: Submariner 14060M
Accurist: 1961 Shockmaster (Gold) & 1965 Shockmaster (Steel)
Omega: Speedmaster Professional 3570.50.00
Meistersinger: Perigraph AM1002
Ben Sherman: S489.OOBS
Rotary: 1990 Quartz (Gold)
Steinhart: Ocean GMT 39mm
Certina: DS Super PH500M & DS PH200M
Timex: MKI Mechanical
-
Oct 14, 2015, 05:15 PM
#10
Member
Maybe Rolex will *cough* reduce the prices of their models . . .