Likes Likes:  18

View Poll Results: What wrist do you wear your watch on?

Voters
48. You may not vote on this poll
  • Right

    13 27.08%
  • Left

    33 68.75%
  • I am Diego Maradona

    2 4.17%
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 61

Thread: What wrist do you wear your watch (and why)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Teeritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Melb, AUS
    Posts
    524
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Dienekes View Post
    If you wear it on the right, pushers and crowns don't dig into your hand and are easier to operate. Makes total sense. I can't do it though.
    If, however, we think back to the '50s and '60s, then that was the era of;

    a) Smaller, lighter watches, with smaller crowns that were much less prone to digging into the hand.

    b) A higher number of hand-wound watches, which required winding on a daily basis.

    c) More watches on either leather straps, which had a little bit of give in them, or expanding bracelets like the kind that Speidel were famous for. This meant that the wearer could wind the watch while it was still on his wrist.

    Modern watches are larger and heavier and therefore have a tendency to slide down the wrist so that any or all pushers will leave a mark on the back of the hand. Back in the days when an Omega Speedmaster or Rolex Submariner were considered large watches, this may not have been an issue.

    Bear in mind that this is just a theory of mine, but I base it on what I saw during my time selling wristwatches. Some movers and shakers wore their (usually very expensive) watches on their dominant hand so that, when they extended their hand to shake yours, you would catch a glimpse of the Royal Oak Offshore or Big Pilots Watch they were wearing. In their non-dominant hand, they would be holding the keys to their Porsche or Audi TT. And they would make sure that you saw them.

    teeritz

    (IWL Member No. 72)
    **************
    My other distractions ---> http://www.teeritz.blogspot.com.au

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Teeritz View Post
    Bear in mind that this is just a theory of mine, but I base it on what I saw during my time selling wristwatches. Some movers and shakers wore their (usually very expensive) watches on their dominant hand so that, when they extended their hand to shake yours, you would catch a glimpse of the Royal Oak Offshore or Big Pilots Watch they were wearing. In their non-dominant hand, they would be holding the keys to their Porsche or Audi TT. And they would make sure that you saw them.
    Interesting. As a non-mover and a passable shaker at best, I started wearing mine on my right hand around 7th grade. No grandiose plans then, other than to somehow snag a kiss with Stacy, whose mom was kinda smokin'.

    But on a serious note, I find that wearing the watch on the dominant hand is helpful in some scenarios where I use a watch to time my performance. Sometimes, right is better and sometimes, left is better. But over the years, it's become a habit, so everything else is irrelevant and quite incidental. I just wear it on the right because wearing it on the left now feels weird.
    Last edited by M. Montaigne; Nov 27, 2014 at 09:26 PM.

  3. #3
    MultiModerator Martin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,545
    Quote Originally Posted by Teeritz View Post
    I'm right-handed. Watch goes on my left wrist. Non-dominant hand, which means (slightly) less likely to get banged around.
    Same here for the same reason

    Quote Originally Posted by Dienekes View Post
    If you wear it on the right, pushers and crowns don't dig into your hand and are easier to operate. Makes total sense. I can't do it though.
    One of the first things my watchmaker told me was to never wind a watch or set the time when on your wrist. The forces on the stem are way to high that way as you tend to bend it upwards.

  4. #4
    Ich bin ein Ebeler! WWII70's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Boston ex-pat Brit
    Posts
    4,548
    That's my reason. Starting wearing my watch on the right wrist when I was in school, as the crown bothered me. I just styaed that way.

    Actually, I never got the logic for 'left wrist for righties".

    Quote Originally Posted by Dienekes View Post
    If you wear it on the right, pushers and crowns don't dig into your hand and are easier to operate. Makes total sense. I can't do it though.
    Ebels (lots), IWC, Omega, FC, Eterna, Tag, Invicta, Movado
    If you are interested in the details http://www.intlwatchleague.com/membe...70&tab=aboutme

  5. #5
    Licorice eater Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,596
    Blog Entries
    2
    Oops, hit the wrong button. Actually wear 'em on my left, not my right. Why? Force of habit mostly. But if you want to know the real reason it has to do with a sacred oath I took many years ago. This was part of a secret ceremony involving a drop of blood from my fingertip, sacrificing of a goat, incantations in Pali, ritual deflowering of Maltese virgins, ingestion of a secret decoction containing vile porky unmentionables and thimblewort, howling at the quartered moon, invoking the spirit of Gadiolinus, kneeling before an altar of skulls, and vowing to never, on pain of death, wear a watch on any wrist other than my left.
    Слава Україні! 🇺🇦

  6. Likes chicago, wschofield3 liked this post
  7. #6
    Loves to yap about quartz I-B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Hasselt-Limburg-Flanders-Belgium
    Posts
    3,420
    Left-handed and left-wearing ...

  8. #7
    Dude, what were you smoking and where can I get some?

  9. Likes chrono555 liked this post
  10. #8
    Licorice eater Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,596
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by M. Montaigne View Post
    Dude, what were you smoking and where can I get some?
    Given the time frame it was most likely black Nepali hash. That stuff was exquisite. Then again it could've been Thai stick. Wouldn't have a clue where to source either these days. <sigh>
    Слава Україні! 🇺🇦

  11. Likes M. Montaigne, Seriously, chicago liked this post
  12. #9
    Loves to yap about quartz I-B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Hasselt-Limburg-Flanders-Belgium
    Posts
    3,420
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    Given the time frame it was most likely black Nepali hash. That stuff was exquisite. Then again it could've been Thai stick. Wouldn't have a clue where to source either these days. <sigh>
    Name:  frank01.jpg
Views: 69
Size:  21.8 KB

  13. #10
    Old Fogey Support Team chrono555's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    At the car, just fetching your zimmer frame.
    Posts
    361
    Right. Just to be different.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are an independent and wide-ranging forum for watch enthusiasts. From mainspring to microchip, from Europe to Asia, from micro-brand to boutique - we cover it all. Novice or expert, we want you to feel at home. Whether it's asking a simple question or contributing to the fund of horological knowledge, it's all the same hobby. Or, if you like, you can just show us a picture of your new watch. We'll provide the welcoming and courteous environment, the rest is up to you!
Join us