-
Dec 5, 2014, 01:33 PM
#21
Casual iPhonographer
I agree, not all dates are created equal..a few "big dates" have caught my attention, if only I have the funds..
-
Dec 5, 2014, 01:51 PM
#22
MultiModerator
For me it's, like many others, a matter of balance. So when possible no date, and if needed at six, or a big date at 12!
Same goes for Chrono's, 3-6-9 is nice, 3-9 is lovely. 6-9-12 not so. Does anyone make a 12-3-6 btw?
-
Dec 5, 2014, 02:08 PM
#23
I'm like others in that I would prefer a hand-wind to be without date, just as a matter of convenience. Other than that, I have both and a date window is only conspicuous by poor execution. I don't mind a date at 4:30 if it preserves the marker concept or is necessary because of chronograph subdial placement.
I have to admit that I catch myself looking at a no-date watch to check the date far more often than being annoyed by the date window's presence, but I don't lose sleep over it.
Rick "not a slave to symmetry" Denney
More than 500 characters worth of watches.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Dec 5, 2014, 02:19 PM
#24
I have no watches that don't have a date. I depend heavily on knowing what day of the month it is for paperwork. So I always have a date on my watches.
-
Dec 5, 2014, 02:27 PM
#25
Even though I am almost always near a computer or phone with the date on it, I still want it on my watch. I sold my Speedy and Sub 14060M because I could never adjust. I do appreciate the aesthetics of a date free dial, but it just doesn't work for me. Function over style when it comes to that particular feature.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Dec 5, 2014, 02:34 PM
#26
Member
For my daily wearer I like to have a date. I probably check it more times than I realize. It does kill the design on some watches if not done well...Christopher Ward Trident C60 comes to mind.
-
Dec 5, 2014, 02:46 PM
#27
Originally Posted by
Der Amf
Another thing I have against date windows is how cheap they can look in comparison with the rest of the watch: deeply set beneath the dial, with a gap between the frame and the wheel, the wheel not presenting the date accurately in the middle of the window...yuk.
Example of one being so deep and distant that the relationship with the dial is weakened:
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Dec 5, 2014, 03:56 PM
#28
Originally Posted by
Ben
Some watches do date windows very well, using them to achieve balance on the dial. In most cases though, I can do without them. An example of
excellent use of a date window, which perfectly creates balance on an asymmetrical dial:
Yes, that works perfectly..
G-Shock: GW3000B-1A
Rolex: Submariner 14060M
Accurist: 1961 Shockmaster (Gold) & 1965 Shockmaster (Steel)
Omega: Speedmaster Professional 3570.50.00
Meistersinger: Perigraph AM1002
Ben Sherman: S489.OOBS
Rotary: 1990 Quartz (Gold)
Steinhart: Ocean GMT 39mm
Certina: DS Super PH500M & DS PH200M
Timex: MKI Mechanical
-
Dec 5, 2014, 03:58 PM
#29
Originally Posted by
geoffbot
This works for me too - balances the marker nicely
Are date wheels ever lumed? That would be awesome - a marker-shaped lumed date window.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Dec 5, 2014, 04:00 PM
#30
Not a pre-req; but if there is one, it must....
Read horizontally (9 through 3);
Not encroach on anything else on the dial;
Not have a 'cyclops'.
Some people have opinions - The rest of us have taste.