Likes: 0
Hi guys, I'm pretty sure this has been asked before but would anyone have both watches and compare the size of both? I have the PAG240 and its is indubitably a monster, at least for me, but I like it. Wanted to know if there's a jump in size and heft between these two or are they just roughly the same. Thanks so much for any input.
I sold my Rangeman so I cannot directly compare but they are roughly the same. Rangeman has a little less diameter I think but is more bulky. If you can wear one you can wear the other, too.
Cheers, Sedi
Originally Posted by Sedi
I sold my Rangeman so I cannot directly compare but they are roughly the same. Rangeman has a little less diameter I think but is more bulky. If you can wear one you can wear the other, too.
Cheers, Sedi
Thanks Sedi - I know from reading that one of your favorites is the PRG-270. Just got delivery today of my 270 and it wears great. I wasn't aware that its as thin as it is.
Let me know if you need more. Pardon the bad phone pic
Last edited by breaking100; Dec 2, 2014 at 03:48 AM.
Awesome thanks breaking100.
seiko · orient · casio · timex · rolex · omega · victorinox · suunto · steinhart
Children need your help. Please share your blessings...
UNICEF - http://www.unicefusa.org
CARITAS - http://www.caritas.org/
NO KID HUNGRY - http://www.nokidhungry.org/
I have both. (Not sure I have a shot of the two of them together, though.)
For my money, the Rangeman wears and feels, if anything, less bulky than the 240. Its strap is also a bit more "form fitting". No question. If you can happily wear a 240, I don't think you'll have any issue with the Rangeman.
Thanks so much sirs! In that last picture by breaking100, the Core looks like a baby
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
