-
Dec 15, 2014, 04:09 PM
#11
Member
I wonder whether it has the smoothest sweep ever? Be a shame for it to be a ticker.....
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Dec 15, 2014, 04:51 PM
#12
I can see it now...IWL in 20 years and we'll be getting threads 'please help - my watch is loosing a nano second a day'
Sent from my GT-I9505
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Dec 15, 2014, 04:55 PM
#13
Originally Posted by
pepperami
I can see it now...IWL in 20 years and we'll be getting threads 'please help - my watch is loosing a nano second a day'
Sent from my GT-I9505
Or, "which is better: cesium or Rolex?"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
-
Dec 15, 2014, 05:12 PM
#14
Originally Posted by
Ryan
Or, "which is better: cesium or Rolex?"
This watch contains Cesium 133, but Rolex would have their own in-house Cesium 904L...
-
Post Thanks / Like - 5 Likes
-
Dec 15, 2014, 05:47 PM
#15
It's interesting...but it also seems like it's solving a problem that doesn't exist. While we want our watches to be accurate I don't think the average person willing to pay $6k for a watch is needing or wanting this level of accuracy.
In this case size does matter and I don't think many people want to strap something that large onto their wrist.
-
Dec 15, 2014, 05:49 PM
#16
Originally Posted by
Perseus
It's interesting...but it also seems like it's solving a problem that doesn't exist.
This
-
Dec 15, 2014, 07:20 PM
#17
The Dude Abides
Looks like my wife's coin purse......
"Either He's Dead, Or My Watch Has Stopped....."
Groucho Marx
-
Dec 15, 2014, 07:37 PM
#18
-
Dec 15, 2014, 07:49 PM
#19
Originally Posted by
tribe125
It seems so:
http://www.ablogtowatch.com/hoptroff...-year-accuracy
Both have the same basic shape as they must accomodate the CSAC chip:
-
Dec 15, 2014, 07:52 PM
#20
Originally Posted by
Nokie
Looks like my wife's coin purse......
You're not talking euphemistically are you Nokie ?