-
Dec 20, 2014, 02:20 PM
#1
Dinger of Hum
SEIKO Hands Not running at Proportionate rate
Who else has seen this?
On some of my Seikos. the hour hand does not always land on every hour perfectly. On most, but not on all 12 of them.
When I use the crown to fast forward the hands, I noticed the following:
When the minute hand moves, the hour hand is occasionally not moving - for about the duration of 5 - 10 minutes - and then suddenly "jumps" as if to catch up.
So, for example, the time reads: 3:30, so the the hour hand points to 17.5, as it should.
But then, even when the minute hand is at 3:37, the hour hand has not moved at all - still pointing to 17.5
Then all of sudden, at 3:40. the hour hand jumps to be where it should be.
All this has the effect of the hour hand not always nailing the landing on every hour marker on the hour.
Why does this happen? Is this a Seiko problem? I have not seen this on any ETA movements.
Last edited by Chronopolitano; Dec 20, 2014 at 02:23 PM.
-
Dec 20, 2014, 02:28 PM
#2
MultiModerator
Isn't this just play in the wheels? Is this a new or an old, not recently serviced watch?
-
Dec 20, 2014, 02:31 PM
#3
Dinger of Hum
Originally Posted by
Martin
Isn't this just play in the wheels? Is this a new or an old, not recently serviced watch?
Not sure - but they're new.
Oh, maybe I modded a few.
Did I screw up?
-
Dec 20, 2014, 02:35 PM
#4
MultiModerator
Originally Posted by
Chronopolitano
Not sure - but they're new.
Oh, maybe I modded a few.
Did I screw up?
What did you mod? If you did not take the movements apart, or put a lot of strain on the hands, I cannot imagine that you caused this.
-
Dec 20, 2014, 03:35 PM
#5
Dinger of Hum
Originally Posted by
Martin
What did you mod? If you did not take the movements apart, or put a lot of strain on the hands, I cannot imagine that you caused this.
I forget which models - some SNZH, SRP, etc.
No, I did not mess with the movement. It was usually swapping only dials and hands.
But I have seen new Seikos also with this same problem, so I don't think it's just me doing all this.
Are the hands slipping on the post? If so, why?
-
Dec 20, 2014, 03:57 PM
#6
MultiModerator
If the hands were slipping on the post, they won't catch up. So it must be in the gears somewhere
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Dec 20, 2014, 04:08 PM
#7
Not seen this on ony of mine. Had three, but only one at the moment...
G-Shock: GW3000B-1A
Rolex: Submariner 14060M
Accurist: 1961 Shockmaster (Gold) & 1965 Shockmaster (Steel)
Omega: Speedmaster Professional 3570.50.00
Meistersinger: Perigraph AM1002
Ben Sherman: S489.OOBS
Rotary: 1990 Quartz (Gold)
Steinhart: Ocean GMT 39mm
Certina: DS Super PH500M & DS PH200M
Timex: MKI Mechanical
-
Dec 20, 2014, 04:53 PM
#8
Dinger of Hum
Originally Posted by
Martin
If the hands were slipping on the post, they won't catch up. So it must be in the gears somewhere
Ah so!
So then, maybe those eBay grey market Seikos that start bidding at $0,99 are factory rejects after all?
But that's weird too, since so many of those are also perfectly fine.
No pattern here.
Maybe they're all mixed in for all sorts of reasons..
-
Dec 20, 2014, 05:12 PM
#9
Originally Posted by
Chronopolitano
So then, maybe those eBay grey market Seikos that start bidding at $0,99 are factory rejects after all?
I doubt whether rejects reach the market. Seiko would have better control than that.
-
Dec 20, 2014, 05:32 PM
#10
Last edited by Seriously; Dec 20, 2014 at 05:39 PM.