-
Oct 22, 2016, 03:39 PM
#1
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Oct 22, 2016, 04:36 PM
#2
My
I don't believe you'll see the difference in a couple 3 mm. Both are fine pieces, I could go either way w/ these 2.
On 1 hand I like the hands on the Stowa more but the Muhle's dial IMO is better looking & love the 3,6,12 & stick indices better. So what I'm saying is, damn ! What am I saying!!.
Don't listen to me......
Last edited by watchdaddy1; Oct 22, 2016 at 04:40 PM.
People sleep peaceably in their beds @ night ONLY because rough men stand ready to do VIOLENCE
on their behalf.....
William
Member#842
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Oct 22, 2016, 04:49 PM
#3
I think you'll see a big difference. I can certainly notice the difference between my 37mm watches and my 40mms.
-
Oct 22, 2016, 04:53 PM
#4
Member
The bonus here is the Stowa can be had in manual wind. I prefer manual wind. Henry I agree. We have the same size wrists and 40mm seems large after wearing the 38mm Guinand.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Oct 22, 2016, 04:59 PM
#5
And the Partitio is such a great looking watch too, no offence to Muhle.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Oct 22, 2016, 05:04 PM
#6
Between the Muhle and the Stowa, I would go with the later; I prefer the hands, the numerals, the cleaner (no date ) dial and the hand wind movement. However, I usually find that watches with dark/black dials, sometimes tend to look a bit smaller on the wrist, than their counterparts with silver/white dials, so... I don't really know what to say.
-
Oct 22, 2016, 06:38 PM
#7
Originally Posted by
Henry Krinkle
... the Partitio is such a great looking watch too...
Originally Posted by
CFR
... I prefer the hands, the numerals, the cleaner (no date ) dial and the hand wind movement.
^^^ What they said. I much prefer the Partitio, too.
I find myself heading in the same direction size wise, albeit a gradual transition - Not so long ago I wouldn't have entertained anything less than 40mm; then I bought the Smiths @ 39mm and have hardly taken it off in nearly 6 months. The next step will be the MKII Hawkinge @37.8mm which should be arriving in a few weeks; we'll see how that fares against the Smiths
Some people have opinions - The rest of us have taste.
-
Oct 22, 2016, 08:15 PM
#8
3mm is almost 10 percent! Of course you'll notice the difference. People quibble over one millimeter, three is a world apart in watches.
The Muhle is much better looking, in my eyes.
-
Oct 22, 2016, 08:17 PM
#9
Originally Posted by
Henry Krinkle
I think you'll see a big difference. I can certainly notice the difference between my 37mm watches and my 40mms.
There's a big difference between my 41mm Black Bay and my 42mm Speedmaster, that's for sure. If anything, the Black Bay wears larger, but that's neither here nor there.
-
Oct 22, 2016, 08:33 PM
#10
They are both really good looking watches from two really good companies. I often wear 36-38mm watches (which feel just right on my wrist) and often even 40mm look a bit large to me. I understand your interest.
Too many watches, not enough wrists.