-
MultiModerator
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
-
Stunning aren't they. I love this combination. So warm, and map ages to incorporate a complication and stay dressy.
G-Shock: GW3000B-1A
Rolex: Submariner 14060M
Accurist: 1961 Shockmaster (Gold) & 1965 Shockmaster (Steel)
Omega: Speedmaster Professional 3570.50.00
Meistersinger: Perigraph AM1002
Ben Sherman: S489.OOBS
Rotary: 1990 Quartz (Gold)
Steinhart: Ocean GMT 39mm
Certina: DS Super PH500M & DS PH200M
Timex: MKI Mechanical
-
Member
I know it's very subjective but when I first saw them, I was underwhelmed style wise. They're obviously built well in the typical Rolex fashion, but I prefer the older Cellini models aesthetically . . .
-
The Dude Abides
I kind of like the newer ones. Just seem a bit more elegant to me.
"Either He's Dead, Or My Watch Has Stopped....."
Groucho Marx
-
Jan 10, 2015, 01:30 AM
#5
The watch watcher
I like the new ones OK, but others I would rather have for the money but my favorite is still this one, and I don't even like colored gold...
ALS Blancpain Breguet Hamilton IWC JLC Omega Panerai Patek Rolex Tag Tudor Seiko Sinn UN Vacheron
It's wack if it don't say Patek!
Stealin' lunch money on school playgrounds for Rolex since 1978
-
Mar 31, 2015, 08:33 PM
#6
Member
Like them a lot but I'm not that fancy of a guy. Same reason I shyed away fro a Reverso. Too dressy for my style but admire them from afar
-
Big Member
Cellini was one of the first Rolexes to strike my fancy as a young man in the 80's the Cellinium I believe it was called.
There were several variations so if this wasn't the exact one it was similar.
(Google image)
-
I very much like the Cellini Time in white gold and white dial. It's on my list for when I get rich someday
-
They're a bit too pinky in the air with afternoon tea in fancy cups for me.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Aug 10, 2015, 03:34 AM
#10