-
Jan 11, 2015, 05:13 PM
#1
Dinger of Hum
-
Jan 11, 2015, 05:52 PM
#2
Hamilton, even sans second hand
-
Jan 11, 2015, 05:55 PM
#3
I prefer the Hamilton, but I do wish it had a second hand.
-
Jan 11, 2015, 05:57 PM
#4
Dinger of Hum
Originally Posted by
geoffbot
Hamilton, even sans second hand
Hmmm, yes, I must say I kinda like the nifty-fifty vibe of that drive-through-diner -stylized motif in the logo 'H'...
-
Jan 11, 2015, 06:01 PM
#5
-
Jan 11, 2015, 06:03 PM
#6
Dinger of Hum
Originally Posted by
Der Amf
What's the third option?
Take the seconds hand from the ZENO and put it on the Hamilton. I guess.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Jan 11, 2015, 06:04 PM
#7
-
Post Thanks / Like - 4 Likes
-
Jan 11, 2015, 06:08 PM
#8
I have this Zeno
On my phone right now,will come to you later on it :-)
-
Jan 11, 2015, 06:10 PM
#9
The zeno is mineral [actually it's sapphire] the hammy is sapphire. The zeno is a 2824, the hammy a 2892. Except for the lack of second hand it's a clear winner imo
Last edited by geoffbot; Jan 12, 2015 at 07:03 AM.
Reason: Crystal correction
-
Post Thanks / Like - 4 Likes
-
Jan 11, 2015, 06:12 PM
#10
Dinger of Hum
Originally Posted by
WWII70
I feel a "three-hander with date" really needs a second hand and I would suggest the Ebel Classic 100 LE (can be had for less than $1100)
My FC Moonphase lacks a second hand and date window but has the date and moonphase in a subdial. Thinking you need an extra complication to make up for that missing second hand.
I used to love moonphases but am slowly falling out of love with them.
That Ebel is nice, but I am somehow attracted to the hardass aesthetics of the ZENO.
No wonder - am a bit of a hardass myself.