Likes Likes:  6
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: IsoFrane - Modern vs Vintage

  1. #1

    IsoFrane - Modern vs Vintage

    It occurred to me the other day that some folks may not be aware of the fact that IsoFrane straps go back to the late 1960's and 1970's. The company went dormant for many years until the "new" IsoFrane company started producing new versions of the classic IsoFrane ladder design rubber diver strap.

    The new straps are designed to look like the originals, but they are actually a bit more thick and robust. The vintage straps are a bit more thin and pliable than the newest generation. This makes them a little more comfortable than the new straps (even though they are one of the most comfortable rubber straps in the market today).

    The buckle design on the new straps is far better than the vintage buckles. They are much more robust and better engineered. The vintage buckles are perfectly adequate though.

    I own multiples of both kinds and love both styles. But, I feel the modern straps work better with modern watches and likewise with the vintage straps.

    BTW - The pricing is generally $75 - 125 more for a vintage. This is due to the fact that they are fairly rare and it also varies on NOS vs used.

    Attached are some comparison photos (modern on left, vintage on right).














    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Andrema; Feb 8, 2015 at 03:53 PM.

  2. Likes Bwana, Lexvil, deCompression, T Bone, DM71, Raza liked this post
  3. #2
    Nice post and comparison between the vintage and modern, I may try one of these again someday especially if they made a thinner "vintage" style.

  4. #3
    The Dude Abides Nokie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Northern CA
    Posts
    3,516
    Good comparison. The newer buckle is light years ahead of the vintage one, but no matter the age, they make very nice dive straps.
    "Either He's Dead, Or My Watch Has Stopped....."
    Groucho Marx

  5. #4
    dive dude deCompression's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    20.000 miles under the sea
    Posts
    4,561
    Thanks for the comparison !

    Slightly thicker today....
    Regards Phil

    ★★


  6. #5
    Member Steppy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Melton Mowbray, Uk
    Posts
    1,911
    I've tried one of the modern ones, never again, they are far too thick. Vintage seems the way to go

  7. #6
    Watch Geek T Bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Metro Detroit
    Posts
    1,226
    Thanks for this, the first write up I've seen of the vintage. While I have one of the modern ones and quite like it, the vintage would be a kick to get some exposure to. Only seen a few pics of the originals, this comparison is very helpful (tried to add to your reputation for the informative value of the post, but apparently you were the last one I dished rep too, so I get the message I need to spread more around before I can add to yours again ).

    Certainly looks like they've done a good job capturing the look on the modern ones, while perhaps enhancing the overall robustness which should ostensibly translate to more longevity for the strap's life time.
    Regards, T Bone

    Even a broken watch shows correct time once or twice a day. I ought to know, I have a few!

  8. #7
    Member DM71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Québec, Canada
    Posts
    636
    Thanks for the comparison! I have a few modern ones, and I like them a lot, but I would love to find a vintage one. I like thick straps, but thin straps are sometimes more adequate.
    ~Daniel~

  9. #8
    Super Member Raza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    19,347
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks for posting! The modern ones have always struck me as too thick, so I have never shelled out the C-note to buy one. Looks like I was justified.

    I don't get the obsession with thick and wide straps these days. I never found them comfortable.

  10. #9
    I agree the thicker new gen ones make sense for today's bigger watch I have the new once since Xmas been happy with it.

    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1424555119.568340.jpg

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are an independent and wide-ranging forum for watch enthusiasts. From mainspring to microchip, from Europe to Asia, from micro-brand to boutique - we cover it all. Novice or expert, we want you to feel at home. Whether it's asking a simple question or contributing to the fund of horological knowledge, it's all the same hobby. Or, if you like, you can just show us a picture of your new watch. We'll provide the welcoming and courteous environment, the rest is up to you!
Join us