-
Feb 19, 2015, 04:27 PM
#1
Member
-
Feb 19, 2015, 04:58 PM
#2
Theoretically - not related to any specific pair - I would always go with the more "satisfying" (to use your word) option. When it comes to watches, pleasure of ownership of something you actually like to wear is crucial.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
-
Feb 19, 2015, 06:15 PM
#3
The Dude Abides
The one I like best.
At this time it is the JLC, but tomorrow it could be the Visodate,
"Either He's Dead, Or My Watch Has Stopped....."
Groucho Marx
-
Feb 19, 2015, 06:18 PM
#4
Original Gangsta
From an aesthetics perspective, I like the IWC best, but I am not a fan of the second markers.
The Visodate is a close contender, but I abhor the font in which Tissot is written. It makes the whole watch look like a gimmick.
I find the aesthetics of the JLC and the Oris absolutely unappealing, so those aren't even contenders.
I would call them butt ugly, but then I wouldn't want to offend Invicta owners.
-
Feb 19, 2015, 06:23 PM
#5
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
-
Feb 19, 2015, 06:55 PM
#6
Member
The choice is really more about going with something you like rather than something you respect...regardless of brand. To make it more straightforward, would you choose a SARB over a Grand Seiko because your clear-cut preference for the presentation of the simpler watch overrides your admiration for the technical achievements of the other?
The former could perhaps be classified as pleasure while the latter might be termed esteem.
Last edited by ljb187; Feb 19, 2015 at 07:08 PM.
-
Feb 19, 2015, 06:59 PM
#7
Original Gangsta
Originally Posted by
ljb187
The choice is really more about going with something you like rather than something you respect...regardless of brand. To make it more straightforward, would you choose a SARB over a somewhat similar Grand Seiko because (in this case) you have a pronounced preference for the details in SARB's design that overrides your admiration for the Grand Seiko?
Unlike most other consumer goods, with watches, brand cachet strongly correlates to quality.
Pateks do not have a great brand image (just) because they are expensive; rather, it is a function of quality and finish, and that shows up in pricing as well.
Therefore, if I had to choose, it would be a combination of aesthetics and quality (and this includes movement, finish, and other factors). Brand prestige is almost never a factor (in fact, my favorite watches are almost all Seikos).
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Feb 19, 2015, 07:46 PM
#8
Dinger of Hum
Sounds to me like two entirely different sets of criteria for enjoyment. Sex or food? Travel or a new car?
That said, by all means, choose the right enjoyment for yourself.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Feb 19, 2015, 07:55 PM
#9
Member
Originally Posted by
M. Montaigne
Unlike most other consumer goods, with watches, brand cachet strongly correlates to quality.
Pateks do not have a great brand image (just) because they are expensive; rather, it is a function of quality and finish, and that shows up in pricing as well.
Therefore, if I had to choose, it would be a combination of aesthetics and quality (and this includes movement, finish, and other factors). Brand prestige is almost never a factor (in fact, my favorite watches are almost all Seikos).
Correct, but given an acceptable level of quality (Oris, Tissot, SARBs, Hamilton), couldn't aesthetics tip the scales in favor of a much lesser watch simply because you find more to like...not a whole lot...but enough. To keep with the Seiko example because nobody does a better job a the low & high ends of the spectrum:
I put $6000 on a table. Your choice is between a SARB013 and a SBGR083. You're blown away by the chance to own a great watch but in the back of your mind you know rather wear the SABR despite the GS's obvious quality. Think of it this way...I can only semi-fathom how great the houses in Beverly / Holmby Hills are, but you can claim one for your own if you want:
But has always been your dream house:
The Beverly Hills home is spectacular...worth tons more ($12,000,000) plus it's less than 10 miles from the ocean. However, the beach house is no slouch...maybe $1,000,000....is just a few blocks from the sea and you get to live in a classic Southern California bungalow while riding your bicycle nearly everywhere you go.
Still, everything is going to be a little simpler...you'll have to water your own plants and pluck your own weeds, there's probably only one 1.5 bathrooms and the backyard is about as big as the living room. Plus there will be hippy neighbors instead of servants and 9 year old Jeep in your driveway instead of a Maybach in the garage (or the DB9 for that matter). Think of that stuff as the movement. Understand the location and exterior as the aesthetic...at what point is "less is more" no longer good enough? Is there ever a point when the craftsmanship (and luxury) simply can't be ignored?
Last edited by ljb187; Feb 19, 2015 at 10:12 PM.
-
Feb 19, 2015, 07:55 PM
#10
Member
Is this a trick question? I'm not a huge fan of these outside of liking the IWC a little so if you are talking I had to buy them, obviously I would go with the cheaper two or none. If I were given them, then IWC and JLC because of the brand prestige and finishing quality vs the others.