Likes Likes:  29
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 56 of 56

Thread: Hamilton Khaki White Dial Field Watch

  1. #51
    Moderator - Central tribe125's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Kent - UK
    Posts
    18,909
    Quote Originally Posted by Samanator View Post
    Based on this the general view of what is a field watch and what is not is much broader than what's being discussed. I would have never included the Omega Railmaster. Interesting the Tudor is on there.

    But that’s Gear Patrol. Watch forums would be a little stricter. The MWR forum would be very much stricter.

  2. Likes happyscrappyheropup liked this post
  3. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by tribe125 View Post
    But that’s Gear Patrol. Watch forums would be a little stricter. The MWR forum would be very much stricter.

    Some nice watches in the article, very few are field watches.

    One of my pet peeves in a lot of these watch articles, they only list the watch case diameter. Most of the reviews I read have the watches in hand. Get out the calipers and give us all the dimensions. For my use, thickness is the most important, then L2L and diameter are about equally important.

  4. #53
    Super Member Raza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    23,333
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by happyscrappyheropup View Post
    Some nice watches in the article, very few are field watches.

    One of my pet peeves in a lot of these watch articles, they only list the watch case diameter. Most of the reviews I read have the watches in hand. Get out the calipers and give us all the dimensions. For my use, thickness is the most important, then L2L and diameter are about equally important.
    To be fair, Gear Patrol isn't really a watch site. They probably just grabbed the widths from the manufacturers' websites.
    Read my latest IWL blog entry! An Ode To Rule Breaking

  5. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by Raza View Post
    To be fair, Gear Patrol isn't really a watch site. They probably just grabbed the widths from the manufacturers' websites.

    Agreed, and they just used stock photos there, so they didn't even have the watches. But W&W, Hodinkee, et al, frequently review watches without providing all the dimensions.

  6. #55
    Super Member Raza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    23,333
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by happyscrappyheropup View Post
    Agreed, and they just used stock photos there, so they didn't even have the watches. But W&W, Hodinkee, et al, frequently review watches without providing all the dimensions.
    Yeah, that's true. And I agree with you. That annoys the shit out of me. You have the watches in hand. I want width, lug to lug, lug width, and thickness.
    Read my latest IWL blog entry! An Ode To Rule Breaking

  7. Likes litlmn liked this post
  8. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by Raza View Post
    Yeah, that's true. And I agree with you. That annoys the shit out of me. You have the watches in hand. I want width, lug to lug, lug width, and thickness.

    Since a lot of manufacturers don't publish all dimensions, maybe they don't for fear of alienating buyers before they see the watch in the flesh (at an AD or whatever)? Especially chronographs, which are usually comically thick.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are an independent and wide-ranging forum for watch enthusiasts. From mainspring to microchip, from Europe to Asia, from micro-brand to boutique - we cover it all. Novice or expert, we want you to feel at home. Whether it's asking a simple question or contributing to the fund of horological knowledge, it's all the same hobby. Or, if you like, you can just show us a picture of your new watch. We'll provide the welcoming and courteous environment, the rest is up to you!
Join us