Likes Likes:  7
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Advice Needed 2500 vs 8500

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Another Member crownpuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bristol UK
    Posts
    6,020
    I don't have an 8500 to compare it to and there's no display back to admire it through, but I have no issues with my 2500. Last worn before Christmas after sitting in the box for a few years..... lost all of 1 second in the day that I wore it.
    Not sure that's any help in your decision.

    Name:  1511.jpg
Views: 1780
Size:  191.8 KB

    EDIT: Specifics, dear boy; specifics ?.... It's a 2500D.

    Further EDIT: Regarding thickness - I used to go for big chunky watches but not any more; as I've 'grown up' (debatable !) I definitely lean more towards slimmer watches. I don't even need them to slip under a cuff (polo shirt at work) and rarely wear a shirt & tie, I just prefer them thinner these days.
    The extra 3mm of the 8500 in this case would be a non-starter for me. If it were me, I'd be going for the sleeker model - Less is more, and all that.
    Last edited by crownpuller; Mar 9, 2019 at 05:09 PM. Reason: After-thoughts
    Some people have opinions - The rest of us have taste.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are an independent and wide-ranging forum for watch enthusiasts. From mainspring to microchip, from Europe to Asia, from micro-brand to boutique - we cover it all. Novice or expert, we want you to feel at home. Whether it's asking a simple question or contributing to the fund of horological knowledge, it's all the same hobby. Or, if you like, you can just show us a picture of your new watch. We'll provide the welcoming and courteous environment, the rest is up to you!
Join us