-
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
Matt liked this post
-
I think I used to know the answer to this, and that it was related to processor power and/or memory storage. Both may have been marginal on early digital watches.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-

Originally Posted by
tribe125
I think I used to know the answer to this, and that it was related to processor power and/or memory storage. Both may have been marginal on early digital watches.
yeah maybe as thinking on it's logicality it's not as simple as it first appears . well yes it can be if just numbers then it could keep going like a stopwatch like feature .
but in those ones that include a day then harder as looking at a calendar the days will fall differently each year so to have it right then it would be needed to stored in the memory all years from say a to b but you would think they would have been able to store longer then 35 years worth ?
-
**** A thought on digital vintage watch dates ****
I take it I’m not the only old fogey who remembers all the Y2K panics? Predictions that the world would come to a sudden and abrupt halt were somewhat out. I think all that was down more to people just not thinking about what to do after ‘99 switched to ‘00
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk