There's this chap who is a bit of a personal hero of mine and had a fairly vast influence on my academic career when I was younger. He wasn't so famous then but he's become a bit of a household name recently. He owned a watch and that watch ended up in a museum where I have seen it a few times and, quite properly, lust after it. It's one I loosely look out for and every so often actually search bloody hard for.
Well it's come up... sort of....
The case is exactly the same. The particular case is stupidly rare and I've only seen it on ebay a couple of times. The crown is spot on. The numerals are exactly the same style, size and so on, but very slightly, I mean checking back and forth between two side by side photographs to be sure slightly, different. The mix of indices and numerals is spot on but the indices are very slightly fatter in this one with a sliver of lume. The original has an inner circle that is very slightly darker, while this has an inner circle that isn't much darker, if at all. The hands are all wrong with lume and a different shape, But the originals are just gold wire and I have plenty of those I could swap. The wording on the dial is very slightly different with one word moved from below the maker's name onto a subdial, the jewel count added and four extra numerals. I assume, with good reason, I think, that the movement will be identical.
The watch itself is underpriced, but in somewhere like Guatamala with heavy postage and the promise of import duties. I've certainly been buying a few too many watches recently so I really should think twice about another one. If it was identical I'd snap it up at four times the price but it isn't. It's identical with really really almost, but not quite the right dial and hands. On the other hand, it's the closest I've ever seen that wasn't well into four figures and holds out the possibility of picking up exactly the dial down the road...
So do I or don't I?