-
May 15, 2015, 01:32 PM
#1
-
Post Thanks / Like - 29 Likes
Seriously,
Nutty28,
Henry Krinkle,
Der Amf,
shameless,
MarkO,
Colin,
Matt,
is that my watch,
Jazzmaster,
iyonk,
ljb187,
mlcor,
popoki nui,
birdynamnam,
ck1109,
geoffbot,
Chase,
FuzzyB,
Mediocre,
stewham,
e n n e a,
tempocalypse,
Chicolabronse,
BlackNomad,
GlennO,
watchdaddy1,
wschofield3,
gnuyork liked this post
-
May 15, 2015, 01:40 PM
#2
Very nice to see most of them huddled together in one place CFR
Shame we can't zoom in on the picture though , I could have picked which one's you were going to will me then....
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
CFR liked this post
-
May 15, 2015, 01:46 PM
#3
Originally Posted by
Seriously
Very nice to see most of them huddled together in one place CFR
Shame we can't zoom in on the picture though , I could have picked which one's you were going to will me then....
Thanks!
They've all been individually posted here, often - probably too often - so, it's easy to find more detailed pics somewhere.
-
May 15, 2015, 01:49 PM
#4
Member
Amazing collection, C! Really envious of it.
Oh, by the way, despite this SOTC shot, I think most members here will not "approve" of you not posting on WRUW thread. Those shots were a demonstration of your photography skills. These are entirely two different discussions. So, please continue posting.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 6 Likes
-
May 15, 2015, 01:49 PM
#5
Good to see them all together, but no you are not off the hook.
It is highly unlikely you will ever see my collection that compactly photographed. Scottjc has been trying to get me to do that for several years and the closest I have yet come is one photograph of five watches.
This one to be exact- a micro portion of a micro SotC
NCC- Years Ahead by Hank Blanc, on Flickr
Last edited by Henry Krinkle; May 15, 2015 at 01:52 PM.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 6 Likes
-
May 15, 2015, 01:50 PM
#6
Originally Posted by
Nutty28
Amazing collection, C! Really envious of it.
Oh, by the way, despite this SOTC shot, I think most members here will not "approve" of you not posting on WRUW thread. Those shots were a demonstration of your photography skills. These are entirely two different discussions. So, please continue posting.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks. And it's ok, was just kidding.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
May 15, 2015, 01:51 PM
#7
Or maybe you could run through a basic model number row by row sometimes ... if you can find the time sometime?.....
.. I see ones there and go mmmmmm , but I can't tell what it is sometimes ...
There's a few that are instantly recognisable though.
Thanks. And it's ok, was just kidding.
Yay..... stand down the lynching mob , he was just kidding
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
CFR liked this post
-
May 15, 2015, 01:54 PM
#8
Originally Posted by
Henry Krinkle
Good to see them all together, but no you are not off the hook.
It is highly unlikely you will ever see my collection that compactly photographed. Scottjc has been trying to get me to do that for several years and the closest I have yet com is one photograph of five watches.
The truth is: I hate to photograph more than one watch at a time. The pics are horrible and I didn't care much, because the goal here was to have a global image of the whole gang
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
May 15, 2015, 01:57 PM
#9
Originally Posted by
CFR
The truth is: I hate to photograph more than one watch at a time.
I feel the same. One never gets a good picture of all the watches and more often than not they all look bad.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
May 15, 2015, 02:00 PM
#10
Originally Posted by
Henry Krinkle
I feel the same. One never gets a good picture of all the watches and more often than not they all look bad.
Exactly!