There are rumors of a more exclusive deal between ETA and Richmont. Interesting, given most Richmont brands use in-house.
https://quillandpad.com/2019/12/15/b...atch-industry/
There are rumors of a more exclusive deal between ETA and Richmont. Interesting, given most Richmont brands use in-house.
https://quillandpad.com/2019/12/15/b...atch-industry/
I don’t see any reference to Richemont in that article?
I’d be interested to see another take on this story from the Grenchen local newspaper, because this one doesn’t seem that coherent.
More than 500 characters worth of watches.
COMCO then: "Swatch, you may not stop selling ETA movements to competitors."
COMCO now: "Swatch, you may not sell any movements to your competitors."
Rick "Seems familiar with Swiss business stuff" Denney, is it just me or does this smell like some somewhat corrupt backdoor maneuvers by a competitive, such as Sellita, or a Sellita-dependant brand? Perhaps Sellita is losing their contract with Richemont to ETA, and they are trying to pull some strings? Events and timing just seem shady...
Half a million mechanical movement sales in lost revenue is catastrophic. Especially with essentially zero notice.
Beats me.
But it’s not as though Swatch Group has been consistent. Their desire to halt outside supply vanished in the 2016 downturn, when ETA was making money continuing to sell movements.
Of course, they want the monopoly no matter what they say.
Rick “thinking that after the resurgence of mechanical watches, Comco should have made SMH/Swatch spin off the part of ETA that supplies the industry” Denney
More than 500 characters worth of watches.
The inference I got wasn’t they would no longer be allowed to sell, externally. I think they just won’t be forced to any longer.
According to news today it seems they cannot sell to customers with more than 250 employees.
The whole thing is quite bizarre. Comco are in mental disarray, if they’re being reported accurately.