Likes Likes:  4
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: How did your dive watch fare? Test from 1966-68.

  1. Aug 13, 2015, 05:41 PM #1
    rfortson
    rfortson is offline
    Member rfortson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Houston (Clearlake) TX
    Posts
    706
    500 posts

    How did your dive watch fare? Test from 1966-68.

    Watchtime posted a story yesterday about a study conducted by the British Sub-Aqua Club looking at dive watches. The study started in 1966 and was written up in 1968. Apparently dive watches back then weren't the most reliable. Interesting "results" (not statistically significant, but still interesting) and some familiar names in the mix. Apparently, even back then, Seiko was a great bang for the buck.

    http://www.watchtime.com/featured/di...est-from-1968/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
    Likes OhDark30, OTGabe, is that my watch liked this post
  3. Aug 13, 2015, 10:42 PM #2
    OTGabe
    OTGabe is offline
    Dive Watches & Japanese Moderator OTGabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    3,474
    Site Admin 1000 posts Vibe Badge
    Oh Zodiac...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. Aug 13, 2015, 10:56 PM #3
    deCompression
    deCompression is offline
    dive dude deCompression's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    20.000 miles under the sea
    Posts
    5,253
    Moderator photoaward2 1000 posts
    No surprise by SEIKO.

    Zodiac has the most dives with 1900.
    Regards Phil
    Moderator German Watches & Dive Watches


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. Sep 4, 2015, 06:21 PM #4
    ctlawyer
    ctlawyer is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by deCompression View Post
    No surprise by SEIKO.

    Zodiac has the most dives with 1900.
    The "Test" doesn't seem appropriately weighted based on number of dives to test units as you suggest. That said, it's not surprising that seiko was on top even then.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
    Likes rfortson liked this post
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules and Guidelines

About Us
We are an independent and wide-ranging forum for watch enthusiasts. From mainspring to microchip, from Europe to Asia, from micro-brand to boutique - we cover it all. Novice or expert, we want you to feel at home. Whether it's asking a simple question or contributing to the fund of horological knowledge, it's all the same hobby. Or, if you like, you can just show us a picture of your new watch. We'll provide the welcoming and courteous environment, the rest is up to you!
Join us