-
36 , the new 40
Had a pic. of the newest , both 36mm cased , granted thin and thick bezel which gives different vibes , but , is it the new norm for smaller watches , hope so.
What do you think , and please post, cheers
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
36mm looks just fine on me, and some thin bezel watches look a bit large on me at 40mm... then again I have a few watches I can wear at 42mm, and a half dozen or so 34mm vintage watches that look great. I think my sweet spot is 38-39mm though. I am glad to see these vintage inspired 36's, but I wish there would be more new models in my "Goldilocks zone."
Too many watches, not enough wrists.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
-
For the industry, I think 40 is the new 40, after a period of 42 being 40. If you see what I mean.
For myself, my 7.5” wrist seems to like 37-39, although I can go bigger or smaller, depending on the style.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
-
G-Shock: GW3000B-1A
Rolex: Submariner 14060M
Accurist: 1961 Shockmaster (Gold) & 1965 Shockmaster (Steel)
Omega: Speedmaster Professional 3570.50.00
Meistersinger: Perigraph AM1002
Ben Sherman: S489.OOBS
Rotary: 1990 Quartz (Gold)
Steinhart: Ocean GMT 39mm
Certina: DS Super PH500M & DS PH200M
Timex: MKI Mechanical
-
Post Thanks / Like - 4 Likes
-
Originally Posted by
OrangeSport
I've tried this one on twice too, and it wore perfectly. Tried the red grape like yours, and the white grape more recently. I really would love the white version, but both the grapes were excellent too. If I weren't holding out for the Explorer,I might have bought that white grape (it was used) and not an insane price either, shockingly.