-
***WRUW Sunday 7th March***
G-Shock: GW3000B-1A
Rolex: Submariner 14060M
Accurist: 1961 Shockmaster (Gold) & 1965 Shockmaster (Steel)
Omega: Speedmaster Professional 3570.50.00
Meistersinger: Perigraph AM1002
Ben Sherman: S489.OOBS
Rotary: 1990 Quartz (Gold)
Steinhart: Ocean GMT 39mm
Certina: DS Super PH500M & DS PH200M
Timex: MKI Mechanical
-
Post Thanks / Like - 12 Likes
skywatch,
CFR,
Strela167,
Samanator,
pacifico66,
is that my watch,
gnuyork,
rodia77,
Pip,
ctimrun,
mlcor,
popoki nui liked this post
-
Happy Sunday, IWL
-
Post Thanks / Like - 14 Likes
skywatch,
Fantasio,
Strela167,
Samanator,
pacifico66,
is that my watch,
gnuyork,
rodia77,
tribe125,
hayday,
Pip,
ctimrun,
mlcor,
popoki nui liked this post
-
Hi folks! Kemmner Tourbillon (on iyonk) for my Sunday, with Sea-Gull ST800. Cliché might "affordable luxury" because it really is a well made complication that makes nice wiggly circles every minute, to please the eye. When you see me talking about watch size and my preference for small watches, this is an example of the top of my tolerance zone, at 42mm. You can see from the wrist shot that it dominates my arm. I don't mind, in this case, because I don't consider it an "everyday watch" and at 11mm thick it doesn't impose too much. But when I ponder buying high-end watches, they tend to be 40mm or smaller.
Too many watches, not enough wrists.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 13 Likes
geoffbot,
CFR,
Strela167,
whatmeworry,
pacifico66,
is that my watch,
gnuyork,
rodia77,
Pip,
ctimrun,
mlcor,
popoki nui,
Mystic Nerd liked this post
-
Charging ye olde lume. Legs for @Jeannie 
-
Post Thanks / Like - 13 Likes
CFR,
Strela167,
Samanator,
pacifico66,
gnuyork,
rodia77,
hayday,
Pip,
ctimrun,
skywatch,
mlcor,
popoki nui,
Jeannie liked this post
-
Originally Posted by
skywatch
Hi folks! Kemmner Tourbillon (on iyonk) for my Sunday, with Sea-Gull ST800. Cliché might "affordable luxury" because it really is a well made complication that makes nice wiggly circles every minute, to please the eye.
Simple Tourbillons may not be particularly useful on wrist watch movements, but they are a very cool thing to have; no doubt about that. 
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Originally Posted by
CFR
Simple Tourbillons may not be particularly useful on wrist watch movements, but they are a very cool thing to have; no doubt about that.
Watches are man jewelry, plain and simple!
-
Last edited by CFR; Mar 7, 2021 at 07:40 AM.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 5 Likes
-
Originally Posted by
CFR
No they aren't! At least, not in absolute terms and certainly not to me. I'm used to use a wrist watch to tell the time. Yes...well...you know...
Besides, the phone is not a practical replacement; otherwise we would still use pocket watches.
Okay anything more expensive than a casio f71 is man jewelry!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
CFR liked this post
-
Originally Posted by
geoffbot
Okay anything more expensive than a casio f71 is man jewelry!
Not exactly, because (to me) it needs to be analog for a quick reading and an instrument doesn't need to be ugly. 
-
Mar 7, 2021, 07:54 AM
#10
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
CFR liked this post
Likes: 237
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
