-
Mar 28, 2023, 01:53 AM
#21
Member

Originally Posted by
tribe125
These are my favourites, from what I’ve seen so far -
Maybe my sarcasm meter is broken, but that Zenith screams "I wanted a Patek but couldn't get one." JMO.

Originally Posted by
mlcor
New Lange Odysseus chronograph. Interesting mechanics--the pushers operate the centrally mounted chrono seconds and minutes when the crown is screwed down, when you pull the crown out, they operate the day and date. Only 100 will be made, so if you want one...oops, too late!
Most impressive watch at the show, and it's not even close. Again, JMO.
Omega Aqua Terra 8500 |
Sinn 856S UTC |
Sinn 1746 Klassik |
Sinn 6096 Finanzplatzuhren
Instagram:
@_radharc_
-
Mar 28, 2023, 02:12 AM
#22
Member
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Mar 28, 2023, 11:38 AM
#23

Originally Posted by
Radharc
Maybe my sarcasm meter is broken, but that Zenith screams "I wanted a Patek but couldn't get one." JMO.
I have no insight into what disappointed Patek buyers buy instead of a Patek, but would guess that they might turn their attention to something different, rather than a substitute.
I just look at the Zenith and like it. With a spare £6,700 in my pocket, I might be hightailing it to the Zenith shop, with very little thought of Patek in my mind (or none, probably). If I had another £1,200 spare, I might buy a Defy Skyline instead, if I found I liked it better. Either way, I’d come out of the shop pleased as punch with my new watch.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Mar 28, 2023, 01:22 PM
#24
I gather "superlative chronometer" is Rolex's term for watches that exceed official chronometer standards. A Google search suggests they've been using this term since the 1950's.
Rolex doesn't need any aesthetic or marketing advice from me, but I personally find that term a bit awkward and clunky.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Mar 28, 2023, 01:50 PM
#25
Hangaround member
I agree fully, but luckily it’s such a small font on the dial that my old eyes don’t really see it. 🥸

Originally Posted by
Kronos
I gather "superlative chronometer" is Rolex's term for watches that exceed official chronometer standards. A Google search suggests they've been using this term since the 1950's.
Rolex doesn't need any aesthetic or marketing advice from me, but I personally find that term a bit awkward and clunky.
-
Mar 28, 2023, 03:33 PM
#26

Originally Posted by
tribe125
Colour scheme the same. Not as thick. New bracelet with adjustable clasp.
Yes.
Shame. There was a white gold Cellini I rather liked after trying it on in Hawaii. And it was a cool $9,000 less than this one, as I recall. 23K is asking a lot for Rolex for me, even if it is a precious metal. I mean, that’s Royal Oak money, isn’t it?
-
Mar 28, 2023, 04:48 PM
#27
This is £200 less than a daytona. Sad times for non-loaded watch fans. First mechanical, hi beat.
-
Mar 28, 2023, 04:51 PM
#28
There was this one. Love the colour, and the watch may be Rolex’s finest.
-
Mar 28, 2023, 04:57 PM
#29

Originally Posted by
Raza
Shame. There was a white gold Cellini I rather liked after trying it on in Hawaii. And it was a cool $9,000 less than this one, as I recall. 23K is asking a lot for Rolex for me, even if it is a precious metal. I mean, that’s Royal Oak money, isn’t it?
Umm, not unless you want a women's version...
-
Mar 28, 2023, 05:18 PM
#30
I wouldn’t say no to one of these, but it wouldn’t make much sense next to my blue Black Bay 58.

There’s something slightly odd about a dive watch without its bezel on a jazzy bracelet - and that’s why I like it. 
Nicely offbeat, and a nice range of sizes - 31/36/39/41. 36 or 39 for me.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
Raza liked this post