Likes Likes:  12

View Poll Results: Which Approach Do You Use to Acquire Watches

Voters
12. You may not vote on this poll
  • Grail

    0 0%
  • List

    5 41.67%
  • Gotta Have It

    2 16.67%
  • All of the above

    5 41.67%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: The Grail Versus The Shopping List Versus Gotta Have It Approach to Buying

  1. #1

    The Grail Versus The Shopping List Versus Gotta Have It Approach to Buying

    In about a decade of collecting it strikes me that people tend to approach this hobby in three different ways when it comes to acquisitions, they either fixate on a grail and focus on acquiring it, or they maintain a list of watches they want to own someday and they acquire as the opportunity to acquire something on the list presents itself, or they see a watch somewhere and think gotta have it and they buy it.

    Which way describes your watch acquisition approach and why do you use the approach you use?

  2. #2
    Bone Collector Bwana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Deep in the Timber
    Posts
    1,817
    Yes to all of the above,,,,I don't have a system, just an itch to scratch

  3. Likes Strange, uchinanchu liked this post
  4. #3
    Old but Crafty RayMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Almonte ON Canada
    Posts
    1,871
    Blog Entries
    4
    Not so much a list as a couple of themes. I like windups from the 1930s to the 1950s, and pre WW1 pocket watches in 18S and 16S sizes. My preference is for American brands.
    These have a loose connection to the type of watch my grandfather and father would have used and appreciated.


    Few things are more delightful than grandchildren fighting over your lap. ~Doug Larson

  5. #4
    Can we have a Slowly Groping In The Dark option, please?

  6. Likes Strange, M. Montaigne, ilitig8, OhDark30, shemp liked this post
  7. #5
    Licorice eater Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,624
    Blog Entries
    2
    For me (and I suspect others as well) several but not all of those choices apply. Personally, I don't relate to the 'grail' phenomenon. However, my MO is a hybrid of maintaining a list of wants and gotta have it now.

    I haven't been at this long enough to have a well defined motif in my collecting, and if you look at what I currently own there's precious little stylistic or thematic consistency amongst the horde. I don't know that I'll ever get to the point of defining a specific type of watch to focus on, because my tastes are far too eclectic for that. So the combination of having a general list of pieces I'd like to own while allowing myself the spontaneity to grab some random thing that catches my eye is what works for me at this point.
    Слава Україні! 🇺🇦

  8. Likes hayday liked this post
  9. #6
    I'm a list guy I pretty much exclusive buy used and mostly buy vintage. Since the number of watches I'd like to own someday far exceeds the available funds I'm always looking for bargains. Always sniping low on Ebay auctions or waiting till watches listed on Watchrecon get close to bargain prices so a low offer will more likely be accepted.

    Particularly sweet getting watches that have been on the list for years, sometimes for much less than I was willing to pay. Patience is a virtue.

  10. #7
    My real grails are essentially unobtainable at least without liquidating a huge chunk of my collection for even one of them and at least one grail would require multiple times what my collection would fetch. While I could do it I don't think a Rolex 6263 or 6541 or Patek 2499 would actually get much wrist time, I would wear them but but there would be a lot of stress.

    I have a pretty set buying process. I keep a list of watches I am pretty sure I want to buy the, list is long enough that the watches usually stay on this list for 6 months to a year. Each time I consider adding a new watch I consider the list and sometimes remove a watch or decide not to add the "new" one. Normally, if a watch makes it through the full time period without being taken off it usually ends up being something I really love when I get it. Last week I took a watch off the list that had been there a couple of months, it was just too expensive AND too similar to another watch I owned, in fact it was more or less the same watch just in a different case material and with different accent colors on the dial. What replaced it was significantly cheaper.

  11. #8
    My approach to buying is more related to "I know it when I see it."

  12. Likes shemp liked this post
  13. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray916MN View Post
    why do you use the approach you use?
    If I knew that I'd have a chance of stopping

    I don't have a system, just an itch to scratch
    My approach to buying is more related to "I know it when I see it."
    ^ These ^

  14. Likes Ray916MN liked this post
  15. #10
    My system is pretty much the same as ilitig8's. However, if I see something and say "gotta have it," it goes on the list. And it needs to stay there a while before I act (whether I have the funds set aside for it or not).

    In fact, just today, I struck one off the list...because it's here. Separate post with pics to come...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are an independent and wide-ranging forum for watch enthusiasts. From mainspring to microchip, from Europe to Asia, from micro-brand to boutique - we cover it all. Novice or expert, we want you to feel at home. Whether it's asking a simple question or contributing to the fund of horological knowledge, it's all the same hobby. Or, if you like, you can just show us a picture of your new watch. We'll provide the welcoming and courteous environment, the rest is up to you!
Join us