A friend sent me a link to this:
https://www.gq.com/story/do-you-need...-on-your-watch
GQ article.
On the one hand, it's perfectly true that anyone wearing a mechanical watch in the days of quartz and radio waves cannot have accuracy as their primary consideration. However, the idea of wearing a non functioning watch because of other considerations just seems to be a bit odd,even lazy, to me. If I'm going to wear a storied watch with a beautiful movement, like so:
Then, while I personally don't mind if the rest of the watch looks like it has been attacked by a swarm of heavily armed bees, the movement has to be moving with precision.
But I'm curious as to how many 'watch heads' would be happy to wear an immaculate, but broken or unwound watch?