So, I got my first close look at the Tudor range today. Didn't get time to handle them, but I spent a while looking closely under the AD's expertly placed lighting. Obviously, as we all know, this does make watches catch the eye as much as possible.
But, unfortunately, I was a bit disappointed. I looked mostly at the Black Bay, Ranger, Heritage Chrono and Pelagos.
Contrary to the pictures I have seen the BB really didn't sing to me. It looked rather plain in fact. The Chrono's dial looked very flat, which I know it is, and the watch looked overly thick. The titanium case of the Pelagos just looked dull. I really missed the bling of their Rolex cousins, and it really highlighted the way Rolex shine for me. But perhaps that is the point. Perhaps they are truer to their tool watch brief. They just didn't do it for me.
I have just realised that I didn't see an Advisor. That may have been different. Unfortunately the other, slightly dressier DayDate type models are not really my cup of tea (although they looked larger than I expected).
However, there was one exception. The Ranger. It looked great, and whereas it looks dull and plain in pictures it look more "special" in the metal. Still "tool-watchish", but quality "tool-watchish". Perhaps it was just that it looked better than expected, and the others look less special than I had hoped, but it was the stand-out piece for me and the one I would be most likely to buy.
I know these pieces have a loyal fan base, and I am sure that admiration is deserved. I am also sure that those who have fallen for them will continue to enjoy them. They just weren't what I expected.