-
Nov 19, 2014, 09:18 PM
#1
Look at these stunningly beautiful rotors
-
Nov 19, 2014, 09:21 PM
#2
Very nice ......
But I'm puzzled - the horological machine looks particularly inefficient.. to the point of being completely ineffective... or is it that it has more hidden mass below the surface for one side of the rotor that we can't see from the photo ?
-
Nov 19, 2014, 10:24 PM
#3
Member
-
Nov 19, 2014, 10:32 PM
#4
Antipodean Ape
I guess it's a matter of personal preference but other than the Blancpain most of those are too fancy for my tastes. This is about the right level of decoration for me:
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Nov 19, 2014, 10:44 PM
#5
Member

Originally Posted by
Seriously
Very nice ......
But I'm puzzled - the horological machine
looks particularly inefficient.. to the point of being
completely ineffective... or is it that it has more hidden mass below the surface for one side of the rotor that we can't see from the photo ?

I would put money on it having a one-sided hidden mass.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Nov 19, 2014, 10:52 PM
#6

Originally Posted by
Hayseed Brown
I would put money on it having a one-sided hidden mass.
It has to. There isn't any way around that.
-
Nov 19, 2014, 11:09 PM
#7
Swiss Watch Enthusiast
Orient never makes these lists....
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Nov 19, 2014, 11:56 PM
#8
KEĜJNF

Originally Posted by
Domo
Orient never makes these lists....

Even plain mechanical movements look great. Nothing like a display back. I realize that's not a display back, but if it were I'd still stare.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Nov 20, 2014, 03:23 AM
#9
MB&F always does it up so properly. I don't know how I could pull off one of the HM series of watches, but the movements are amazing. The latest exposé on aBtW about the Space Pirate movement was great.
It is now my duty to completely drain you.
-
Nov 20, 2014, 06:35 AM
#10
MultiModerator

Originally Posted by
Seriously
Very nice ......
But I'm puzzled - the horological machine
looks particularly inefficient.. to the point of being
completely ineffective... or is it that it has more hidden mass below the surface for one side of the rotor that we can't see from the photo ?


Originally Posted by
Hayseed Brown
I would put money on it having a one-sided hidden mass.

Originally Posted by
Broker
It has to. There isn't any way around that.
Are you guys sure? It's not gravity but inertia that makes the rotor move. Automatics do work in space.
And for some more pics, a few examples from the Dutch watchmaker Van der Klaauw:



-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes